54 lines
5.8 KiB
HTML
54 lines
5.8 KiB
HTML
<!-- ==========================================================================
|
||
AISE502 · Moodle course page · Week 14
|
||
Section title (Edit section → Section name): Week 14: Synthesis, Presentations, and Architecture Defence
|
||
Three blocks follow, matching the FHGR section template. Paste each block into the
|
||
corresponding 'Text and media area' (editor → source code view), or all three into one.
|
||
The slide set of lecture 14 is added by the lecturer as a file resource below block 2.
|
||
Generated by src/build_moodle.py from src/content/week_14.json – edit the JSON, not this file.
|
||
========================================================================== -->
|
||
|
||
<!-- BLOCK 1 · Learning objectives -->
|
||
<h4>🎯 Learning objectives</h4>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li>I can read the script backwards as one argument, from assumptions A1–A6 to the ADR with a measurement contract.</li>
|
||
<li>I can distinguish the two temptations, denial and exceptionalism, from the position the script defends: absorption.</li>
|
||
<li>I can explain Maxim 8: why AI, on either axis, changes no step from scenarios to ADR.</li>
|
||
<li>I can explain why Axis A and Axis B reach the same conclusion: one discipline at two binding sites.</li>
|
||
<li>I know the examination facts: 50 %, 60 minutes, open book (script and notes on paper), closed internet.</li>
|
||
<li>I can defend my team's architectural trade-offs on A2's artefacts – ADR, C4 diagram, measurement contract.</li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
|
||
<!-- BLOCK 2 · Theory -->
|
||
<h4>🧑🏫 Theory</h4>
|
||
<p><strong>Lecture 14: Synthesis, Presentations, and Architecture Defence</strong> · 1 lesson synthesis + 3 lessons presentations and defence<br>
|
||
One lesson of synthesis and exam hints with no new material, then three lessons of final presentations, architecture defence and peer reviews (Deliverable A3, milestone M6).</p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li>Two temptations – denial, falsified by adoption data alone (90 % of practitioners by 2025), and exceptionalism, rejected on the evidence – bracket the position defended since Part I: absorption.</li>
|
||
<li>Read backwards, the script is one argument: Part I sets A1–A4 and the twelve dimensions, Parts II–III build capability and requirements profiles, Part IV matches them into an ADR (assumption A5).</li>
|
||
<li>Part V's stress test held (assumption A6). Maxim 8: the theory absorbs AI – tenth class, twelfth dimension, shifted cells, one emergent composition pattern – same assumptions, same procedure, same contract.</li>
|
||
<li>Axis A (cheap generation, verification bottleneck) and Axis B (cheap model output, validation bottleneck) are one discipline at two binding sites: containing cheap, fallible generation behind expensive, explicit verification.</li>
|
||
<li>The written examination: 50 % of the grade, end of semester, 60 minutes, open book (script and own notes on paper), closed internet; focus architecture reasoning – profiles, matching, trade-offs.</li>
|
||
<li>The open-book map: Maxim 8's sentence and four tables – twelve dimensions, consolidated capability table, requirements table, 7 × 10 fit matrix – plus the spine A1–A6 and the Maxims.</li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<p>📎 <strong>Materials:</strong> Slide set of Lecture 14 <em>(added below by the lecturer)</em> · Script: No new script sections – the reading for the examination is the whole script, Parts I–V.</p>
|
||
|
||
<!-- BLOCK 3 · Self-study and assignments -->
|
||
<h4>🧑💻 Self-study and assignments</h4>
|
||
<p><strong>📖 Reading before the lecture:</strong> No new script sections – the reading for the examination is the whole script, Parts I–V.</p>
|
||
<p><strong>Also before the lecture:</strong></p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li>Prepare the final presentation with architecture defence (Deliverable A3): present the system and defend your architectural trade-offs.</li>
|
||
<li>Prepare the reflection on where AI helped and where it hurt – in building (A) and in the system (B).</li>
|
||
<li>Bring your questions on the script and the examination for the Q&A in the synthesis lesson.</li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<p><strong>🧩 Exercise session:</strong> Three lessons of final presentations, architecture defence and peer reviews (Deliverable A3, milestone M6): each team presents its system, defends its trade-offs and reflects on where AI helped and hurt; slot length per team, presentation order and the peer-review form are to be announced.</p>
|
||
<p><strong>🛠️ Project work this week</strong> · Milestone M6 – Presentation and Architecture Defence (week 14)</p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li>Present the system the mandatory part requires – architecture derived from the ontology with ADRs and a C4-style diagram, fully tested deterministic services, an orchestrated advisor with 2–3 sub-agents, ontology guard and resilience, evaluation harness and observability – as a reproducible demo on a data snapshot, keeping the deterministic core free of LLM calls.</li>
|
||
<li>Defend your architectural trade-offs on A2's artefacts – the ADR, the C4 diagram, the measurement contract; the assessment emphasises architecture and trade-offs, robustness, quality, AI integration and operation.</li>
|
||
<li>Reflect on where AI helped and where it hurt – in building (Axis A: generation cheap, verification the bottleneck) and in the system (Axis B: model output cheap, validation the bottleneck) – and test whether one discipline at two binding sites held in your project.</li>
|
||
<li>Peer-review the other teams' presentations and defences – form, criteria and reviewer assignment to be announced; listen for which High weight of R(a) carried their decision and which veto they had to mitigate.</li>
|
||
<li>Be prepared to show one measurement-contract violation being caught by CI (Lecture 11).</li>
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<div style="border-left:4px solid #1b6ec2; background:#eef5fc; padding:8px 12px; margin:10px 0;">📌 <strong>Due this week:</strong> Deliverable A3 (week 14): final presentation with architecture defence, peer reviews</div>
|